John O’Sullivan Censored for Revealing CO2 Truth

As revealed by Jo Nova on her blog ….

John O’Sullivan Censored?

John O’Sullivan wrote this story up a few days ago (link defunct). After two years of writing for “Suite 101″, he has just been suddenly shut down without warning or explanation. He believes it is in retaliation. What did they think it would achieve? All the thousands of links to his archive of stories now point to defunct pages.

See John O’Sullivan’s page now.

——–

Fortunately UKIP Scotland has obtained a copy of the original censored article :

New Satellite Data Contradicts Carbon Dioxide Climate Theory

[By John O' Sullivan, 30th October 2011 - Originally published, and later censored by SUITE101]

JAXA CO2 Satellite Map – NHK World
 Industrialized nations emit far less carbon dioxide than the Third World, according to latest evidence from Japan’s Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA).

Global warming alarmism is turned on its head and the supposed role of carbon dioxide in climate change may be wrong, if the latest evidence from Japan’s scientists is to be believed.

Japanese national broadcaster, NHK World, broke the astonishing story on their main Sunday evening news bulletin (October 30, 2011). Television viewers learned that the country’s groundbreaking IBUKU satellite, launched in June 2009, appears to have scorched an indelible hole in conventional global warming theory.

Standing in front of a telling array of colorful graphs, sober-suited Yasuhiro Sasano, Director of Japan’s National Institute for Environmental Studies told viewers, “The [IBUKU satellite] map is to help us discover how much each region needs to reduce CO2 [carbon dioxide] emissions.”

Industrialized Nations World’s Lowest CO2 ‘Polluters’

Indeed, the map at which JAXA spokesman Sasano was pointing (see photo above) had been expected by most experts to show that western nations are to blame for substantial increases in atmospheric levels of carbon dioxide, causing global warming. But to an officious looking TV interviewer Sasano turned greenhouse gas theory on it’s head.

According to UN science the greenhouse gas theory says more CO2 entering the atmosphere will warm the planet, while less CO2 is associated with cooling. But climatologist, Professor Murry Salby of MacQuarie University, Sydney, Australia admits that, “our understanding of natural contributors to atmospheric CO2 is still very limited.”

Gesturing to an indelible deep green hue streaked across the United States and Europe viewers were told, “in the high latitudes of the Northern hemisphere emissions were less than absorption levels.”

Sasano proceeded to explain the color-coding system of the iconic maps showing where regions were either absorbing or emitting the trace atmospheric gas. Regions were alternately colored red (for high CO2 emission), white (low or neutral CO2 emissions) and green (no emissions: CO2 absorbers).

Bizarrely, the IBUKU maps prove exactly the opposite of all conventional expectations revealing that the least industrialized regions are the biggest emitters of greenhouse gases on the planet.

Yes, you read that correctly: the U.S. and western European nations are areas where CO2 levels are lowest. This new evidence defies the consensus view promoted by mainstream newspapers, such as the New York Times.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) had long claimed that, “there is a consensus among scientists that manmade emissions of greenhouse gases, notably carbon dioxide (CO2), are harming global climate.”

The Japanese satellite map shows regions colored the deepest leaf green (net absorbers of CO2) being predominantly those developed nations of Europe and North America; thus indicating built up environments absorbed more CO2 than they emitted into the atmosphere.

By contrast the bulk of the regions colored red (so-called ‘carbon polluters’) were in undeveloped, densely-forested equatorial regions of Africa and South America.
Huge Headache for Climate Policymakers

JAXA boasts that, “we can reduce the error of the estimated values when we introduce IBUKI’s observation data compared to that of the values calculated in a conventional way based on ground observation data.”

To all policymakers who study the Japanese maps it is apparent that the areas of greatest CO2 emissions are those regions with least human development and most natural vegetation: Equatorial Third World nations.

The Japanese evidence also disproves the often-cited hypothesis that Siberia and other areas of northern Russia were natural vents for large scale CO2 outgassing, exacerbating global warming fears.

In effect, this compelling new data appears to show that the ashphalt and concreted industrial nations are ‘mopping up’ carbon dioxide faster than their manufacturers and consumers can emit it. If this is confirmed, it means a cornerstone of man-made global warming may be in serious doubt.

Can Western Nations Still Proceed with Carbon Taxes?

But now that these so-called “global warming gases” have been precisely measured across the planet the quandary for international policymakers is what to do about plans to further implement international targets for CO2 reduction.

World leaders are getting set to face the latest round of UN climate change talks in Durban next month and must discuss a replacement for the soon to expire Kyoto Protocol, which binds nations to limited CO2 emissions.

The dilemma is whether the established UN global warming policy of the ‘polluter pays’ can any longer be sensibly upheld. Conventional political thinking at previous UN climate conferences was to ‘offset’ carbon emissions by making the worst polluters pay higher ‘carbon taxes.’ But that theory now appears to be rendered redundant being that western economies, believed to be the worst offenders, are in fact, contributing either negligible or no measurable CO2 emissions whatsoever.

Indeed, the IBUKU data indicates that the areas of highest CO2 emissions are precisely those regions with most vegetation and least industry and thus less able to pay.

Thus, the unthinkable could be made real: the greenhouse gas theory of climate change may collapse in the face of empirical evidence that industrialization is shown to have no link to global warming.

For more information the IBUKU achievement is published in the Scientific Online Letters on the Atmosphere (an online thesis magazine) issued by the Meteorological Society of Japan.
Sources [linked above]:

JAXA, Japanese Aerospace Exploration Agency, Greenhouse Gas Observation Satellite ‘IBUKI’ (GOSAT), accessed online: October 30, 2011.

Gillis, J.,’Study Affirms Consensus on Climate Change,’ New York Times, (nytimes.com: accessed online: October 30, 2011)

 Copyright John O’Sullivan. Please contact the author for commercial republication.

[Journalist and legal advocate who writes about and litigates on climate science corruption matters]

UKIP Scotland has republished this important story in the Public Interest

——

            In case you might think that this is somehow just a computer glitch, here is
            John O’ Sullivan’s own statement on the matter at the Climate Realists Blog
                       Popular Skeptic Writer Fired for Exposing Carbon Climate Fraud
 
——–
 
See Also this supporting article :
by Dr. Tim Ball, written on 9th Nov 2011
 
——–
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to John O’Sullivan Censored for Revealing CO2 Truth

  1. askolnick says:
     
    2
     
    0
     
    i
     
    Rate This

    Quantcast

    John O’Sullivan was....{multiple allegations & possible libel deleted -Editor}

    [A long diatribe followed, which seemed like part of an obsessive personal vendetta that Mr. Skolnick has been conducting throughout the blogosphere against Mr. O' Sullivan, and reportedly even members of his family and friends. This is not the place to conduct such vendettas, or to make unsubstantiated personal allegations. Further libellous remarks will be deleted. -Editor]

    • Mike Smith says:
       
      2
       
      1
       
      i
       
      Rate This

      Quantcast

      If I wanted to know the truth,
      I certainly wouldn’t want to …
      “ask ol’ nick”
      [This is a pun? - "ol' Nick" = The Devil -Editor]

      • Mike Smith says:
         
        1
         
        1
         
        i
         
        Rate This

        Quantcast

        Yes a pun ! :)
        I read at wikipedia about Mr. Skolnick ….
        Education:
        In 1972, Skolnick participated in a two-year professional photography certificate program at the Paier Art School. He received a B.A. from Charter Oak State College in 1978. He graduated in 1981 with an M.S. from the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism.

        He would then seem to have pursued a career in medical photography, medicine, and then in mental health and the paranormal, criticising alternative medicine, and then perversly promoting Chinese medicine over Western pharmacology. Now he is apparently an expert in Canadian legal practice, and spends literally hours every day pursuing a single individual throughout the entire internet to the point of clinical obsession.

        So then we must listen to his opinions about Climate Change, and this petty vendettta against investigative journalist, John O’ Sullivan? I don’t think so. This is why I put my brief, but to the point remark. My opinion is that Mr. Skolnick has become a dis-information agent, who was personally riled by Mr. O’ Sullivan’s perceived intrusion into his coterie of acolytes at the linked-in website. He then continued by attacking the man without even listening to the message, or examining the evidence (ad hominem).

        I am grateful that you in the UKIP bring these matters to the wider attention of the UK voter, and the wider population of the World. Lord Monckton does a great job. If only he had a Hawaiian Islands birth certificate, then maybe the World’s degenerates could be banished from the corridors of power at Washington DC. Then we could see a change that we can all believe in. Thank you !

  2. askolnick says:
    Your comment is awaiting moderation.
     
    0
     
    0
     
    i
     
    Rate This

    Quantcast

    It appears UKIP’s editor is blind to the irony and hypocrisy of censoring my comments while deriding the “censorship” of global warming denier John O’Sullivan. I suspect he’ll censor this comment as well, but I’ll at least have a screen capture to show others how Ukipscotland is little more than a propaganda blog.

NOTE:
I captured this web page before the
UK Indenpendence Party's Censor
removed my comment protesting his
previous act of Censorship!

                                        -- Andrew Skolnick



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

Please log in to WordPress.com to post a comment to your blog.

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s