> > > I personally hope the site stays up, and I'd discourage anyone
> > > from complaining about it. It's hard to conceive of anything
> > > that will reflect more negatively on Andrew--personally,
> > > professionally, and in his status as TM critic--than having a Web
> > > page dedicated to Andrew-style (i.e., mendacious) attacks on
> > > *his* critics.
> > P Duff posted: > >
> > I had not yet complained, and shall not, as you request.
> > P Duff
> Andrew Skolnick posted:
>
> Spoken like a true Dittohead.
> Duffy, what do you get out of being Judy's sycophant other than a chance
> to drink your master's bathwater?
And finally the obedient but clueless Duffster posts:
Hi, Andrewl.
The only reason I was going to complain was because your page
might be considered hate-mongering, etc., as I previously pointed out.
But it potentially violates xoom's TOS *only as it applies to Judy*.
It isn't as if you were slamming somebody else and Judy didn't think
shutting you down to be important and I went along with her,
thereby allowing this third party to suffer at your hands. Judy is the *sole* object of your objectionable behavior,
and if she thinks your page is a hoot and thinks its existence
allows you the opportunity to display your twisted nature,
one misspelled line after another, why should I ruin her fun?
P Duff
P Duff is a little more obtuse than usual, isn't he?
Originally Posted:
Subject: Andrew considers drinking Judy's bathwater
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 1998 03:09:12 GMT
From: P Duff
Organization: MicroCephalic Endeavors
Newsgroups: alt.meditation.transcendental